Nikon D3100: Infinitely better than the D3000
To close with a gold key to cracking of posts today, nothing better than to celebrate the day of photography in a big way: The launch of D3100 that has nothing to do with its predecessor, so that the CCD was replaced by CMOS and does that mean? Better quality at high ISOs and Full HD ...
Do not hide that it was not a fan of the D3000, I stated that DSLR was the worst that the Japanese giant had done but he also emphasized that even so, the quality was stupendous, the other is that Nikon was actually much better. The D3100 have radical changes in the previous model : CMOS sensor, 14MP resolution (sensor decreased slightly but not a problem), the ISO jumped meager 3200 (for the current standard of DSLR) to 12800 also due to the CMOS sensor. Another novelty is that Nikon is also announcing the launch of the 55-300 lenses, 85mm, 24-120 and 28-300 .
The Full HD arrive at a rate of 24 fps in MOV format and are limited to 10 minutes but as the complaints about the videos of the D5000 are many, we must be calm and assess whether there was an improvement on that item, so the live view now exist in this version , many people complain that option in the DSLR but in some cases it is really necessary, just missed a movable LCD.
Blogger's opinion: Let's see how much it will cost here in Brazil, technically the jump was too big for D3000 D3100, is recommended and I think it becomes a competitor for the Canon T1i and if there is any release of the Canon in this segment will soon make a comparison of these two cameras.
